Em Rusciano, Australian comedian, writer, singer and media presenter, addresses the National Press Club of Australia in partnership with Women in Media.
Category: Copy
Why Relationships Are Everything I Esther Perel
2:26 / 10:05#EstherPerel#Relationships
Why Relationships Are Everything I Esther Perel
Who Is Esther Perel? Psychotherapist and New York Times bestselling author Esther Perel is recognized as one of today’s most insightful and original voices on modern relationships. CREDIT: Speaker: Esther Perel Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/perelesthe/ Special thanks to Summit https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMGl… =============== THE VIDEO WAS FULLY EDITED AND CAPTIONED BY US. Background Music Licenced. All Video Footage Licenced Through. #EstherPerel#Relationships
John Olsen (Australian artist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| John Olsen AO, OBE | |
|---|---|
| Born | John Henry Olsen 21 January 1928 (age 94) Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia |
| Nationality | Australian |
| Awards | 2005 Archibald Prize |
John Henry Olsen AO OBE (born 21 January 1928) is an Australian artist and winner of the 2005 Archibald Prize.[1] Olsen’s primary subject of work is landscape.
Family and personal life[edit]
John Olsen lives near Bowral, New South Wales. In 1962, he married fellow artist Valerie Strong.[citation needed][29] Daughter Jane Olsen (with first wife Mary Flower), died in 2009.[30] John Olsen was married to his third wife, artist Noela Hjorth until 1986 and married his fourth wife, Katharine Howard, in 1989. Katharine Howard died in 2016.[31][citation needed] Son of the Brush is a 2020 memoir by Tim Olsen about his life as the son of artist John Olsen.
Daughter Louise Olsen is a co-founder of cult Australian fashion jewellery label Dinosaur Designs[3
Why Trying TOO HARD Is Actually Pushing Him AWAY… | Matthew Hussey
SUBSCRIBE►► Find Out The Top 5 Reasons Why Men Disappear With My FREE Guide → http://www.WhyHesGone.com ▼ Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to my YouTube channel now. I post new love life advice for you every weekend. ▼ We all know the feeling. We start speaking to or dating someone and we begin to get excited about them . . . but then as soon as we show interest, they start to pull away. This can be painful and demoralizing. But why does this happen? Is it them, or is it us? In this week’s video, my brother @Stephenhhussey and I break down a number of “them” and “us” scenarios. For instance: • Some people loathe themselves so much that they devalue anyone who starts to see value in them. • Others might have an obsession with attainment, and once they “get” you, they just move on to their next quest. Thankfully, in these examples, you want to scare off a person like that. But sometimes our actions may inadvertently scare them off. For example: when they see us valuing them more than we should, especially given the stage of the relationship we’re currently in. ►► FREE download: “9 Texts No Man Can Resist” → http://www.9texts.com ►► FREE download: “5 Compliments to Get Him Addicted to You” → http://www.SayThisToHim.com ▼ Get My Latest Dating Tips and Connect With Me… ▼ Blog → https://www.howtogettheguy.com/blog/ Facebook → https://facebook.com/CoachMatthewHussey Instagram → https://www.instagram.com/thematthewh… Twitter → https://twitter.com/matthewhussey ▼ Connect with Stephen ▼ Youtube → https://bit.ly/StephenHusseyYoutube Instagram → http://bit.ly/StephenHusseyIG
3 Brutally Honest Reasons Men Don’t Commit
►► Get the Script to Go from Casual to Committed. Unlock Your FREE Video Training. . . → http://www.GetTheFreeTraining.com ▼ Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to my YouTube channel now. I post new love life advice for you every weekend. ▼ Does it sometimes feel like men are afraid of commitment? You could be dating someone for a few months—and have a ton of chemistry and a great emotional connection—and yet, like clockwork, you hit a wall the moment the relationship gets to a stage where it feels like it should be progressing to the next level. Just when you start to feel that this could be something real, he puts his guard up and isn’t ready to commit. Situations like these can be unbelievably painful, and they can leave you feeling crazy as you analyze the situation to death, wondering if you’re somehow not good enough. Well, in this brand-new video, I’ll share with you 3 of the main reasons why a lot of men are afraid of commitment and what you can do to turn things around by circumventing those fears. ►► FREE download: “9 Texts No Man Can Resist” → http://www.9texts.com ►► FREE download: “5 Compliments to Get Him Addicted to You” → http://www.SayThisToHim.com ▼ Get My Latest Dating Tips and Connect With Me… ▼ Blog → https://www.howtogettheguy.com/blog/ Facebook → https://facebook.com/CoachMatthewHussey Instagram → https://www.instagram.com/thematthewh… Twitter → https://twitter.com/matthewhussey
This Romantic Gesture Is Actually a Major RED FLAG | Matthew Hussey
Jun 5, 2022
Design Your North Star With Me & Be Confident in Every Decision. Claim Your Early Bird Discount for The Virtual Retreat . . . → http://www.MHVirtualRetreat.com ▼ Don’t Miss Out! Subscribe to my YouTube channel now. I post new love life advice for you every weekend. ▼ In this video, you will see that the ability to differentiate between short-term excitement and long-term potential will save you a lot of grief and time. It will also give you tools to help you clearly see and navigate around any red flags that may appear on your path. Your coach, Matthew x P.S. Have you ever come across this kind of red flag? Tell me in the comments. ►► FREE download: “9 Texts No Man Can Resist” → http://www.9texts.com ►► FREE download: “5 Compliments to Get Him Addicted to You” → http://www.SayThisToHim.com ▼ Get My Latest Dating Tips and Connect With Me… ▼ Blog → https://www.howtogettheguy.com/blog/ Facebook → https://facebook.com/CoachMatthewHussey Instagram → https://www.instagram.com/thematthewh… Twitter → https://twitter.com/matthewhussey
Finding Love Again after the Loss of a Spouse: Dr. John Gray Shares His Story and Advice
Olivia Newton-John – Make A Move On Me
Olivia Newton-John – If You Love Me – Let Me Know
I copied this Post about COVID Lockdowns
Covid lockdowns killed 20X more people than they ever could have saved

A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health suggests that millions of people would still be alive were it not for the government’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) lockdowns.
Twenty times more people died rather than lived because of the lockdowns, the study reveals. Sedentary behavior, isolation and delayed medical treatments are among the many reasons why lockdowns caused far more harm than good.
“In this work, we performed a narrative review of the works studying the above effectiveness, as well as the historic experience of previous pandemics and risk-benefit analysis based on the connection of health and wealth,” said the authors of the work from the Jerusalem College of Technology.
“The comparative analysis of different countries showed that the assumption of lockdowns’ effectiveness cannot be supported by evidence – neither regarding the present COVID-19 pandemic, nor regarding the 1918 – 1920 Spanish Flu and other less-severe pandemics in the past.”
Entitled “Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics?” the paper contains clear data estimating the number of lives lost due to lockdown restrictions, which were pushed by the likes of Tony Fauci, Deborah Birx and even Mike Pence. People would have been much better off just living their lives as normal, it turns out.
“It should be mentioned that the same conclusions – no clear benefit of lockdowns in case of pandemic – were made by national and international bodies before COVID-19 emerged,” the paper further explains.
“Namely, several governments prepared detailed plans of response to influenza-like pandemics years ago – see the programs of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2007) and the Israeli Ministry of Health (2007).”
In 2019, WHO warned against lockdowns for pandemics saying they’re “not recommended in any circumstances”
Even the World Health Organization (WHO) was against lockdowns before it was suddenly for them at the onset of the Fauci Flu plandemic. Here is what a comprehensive, 91-page preparedness plan released by WHO back in October 2019 says:
- Social distancing measures ‘can be highly disruptive’ and should be carefully weighted;
- Travel-related measures are ‘unlikely to be successful;’ ‘border closures may be considered only by small island nations in severe pandemics;’
- Contact tracing and quarantine of exposed individuals are not recommended in any circumstances.
In other words, pretty much everything that ended up being imposed on the masses to fight covid was something that the WHO warned at least a year prior was not helpful in keeping people healthy and safe.
It is not just that lockdowns were ineffective: they were explicitly harmful, the paper found. They appear to have been used as a means of culling the population, not saving lives. (Related: Communist China is STILL doing lockdowns.)
“The lockdown policies had a direct side effect of increasing mortality,” the paper explains. “Hospitals in Europe and USA were prepared to manage pretty small groups of highly contagious patients, while unprepared for a much more probable challenge – large-scale contagion.”
“As a result, public health care facilities and nursing homes often became vehicles of contamination themselves – to a large extent because of the lockdown-based emergency policy implementation.”
Every other time that lockdown measures have been tried throughout history, the effects were negative. At no point in time have they ever resulted in fewer sicknesses and deaths, and yet lockdowns were the first thing government officials both here and abroad suggested as a way to stop Chinese Germs from spreading.
“While our understanding of viral transmission mechanisms lead to the assumption that lockdowns may be an effective pandemic management tool, this assumption cannot be supported by the evidence-based analysis of the present COVID-19 pandemic, as well as of the 1918 – 1920 H1N1 influenza type-A pandemic (the Spanish Flu) and numerous less-severe pandemics in the past,” the paper concludes.
The latest plandemic-related news can be found at Pandemic.news.
Ethan Huff
Sources for this article include:
Related Posts
- Coronavirus outbreak in two Chinese provinces causes panic all over China, leading to lockdowns, invasive contact tracing and forced mass testing
- China locks down city of 11 million as infections spread; Sweden death rate surges past USA and Switzerland as “non-lockdown” approach disintegrates
- Second wave of coronavirus lockdowns return to China, shattering narrative that Beijing “has it all under control”
- China is looking to relax Wuhan lockdown, but doubts remain – is coronavirus really under control in its epicenter?
Share this:
- Click to Press This! (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on StumbleUpon (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
Related Posts
- Coronavirus outbreak in two Chinese provinces causes panic all over China, leading to lockdowns, invasive contact tracing and forced mass testing
- China locks down city of 11 million as infections spread; Sweden death rate surges past USA and Switzerland as “non-lockdown” approach disintegrates
- Second wave of coronavirus lockdowns return to China, shattering narrative that Beijing “has it all under control”
- China is looking to relax Wuhan lockdown, but doubts remain – is coronavirus really under control in its epicenter?
