Stuart Bramhall says:
“Reblogged this on The Most Revolutionary Act and commented:
Much of the original “proof” that fluoride is safe for humans in low doses was generated by A-bomb program scientists, who were secretly ordered to provide ‘evidence useful in litigation’ [by persons who had been poisoned by fluoride and would sue for damages]. The first lawsuits against the US A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage.”
I am going to reblog this too!
Fluorides, the atomic bomb, and fake news
Faced with toxic fluorides destroying food crops, animal and human life, and with law suits piling up, atomic scientists decided they could distract the nation by promoting fluorides as a beneficial tooth treatment…
by Jon Rappoport
February 1, 2018
Occasionally, I reprint this article. I wrote it some years ago, during research on toxic chemicals pervading the landscape. I used to send the piece to mainstream reporters, but I eventually gave that up as a bad bet.
They’re dedicated to fake news…and now they’re losing control over public consciousness. Losing badly. Independent media are in the ascendance, and rightly so.
In 1997, Joel Griffiths and Chris Bryson, two respected mainstream journalists, peered into an abyss. They found a story about fluorides that was so chilling it had to be told.
The Christian Science Monitor, who had assigned the story, never published it.
View original post 1,142 more words