Eclectic Interests

https://breathelighter.wordpress.com/who-is-breathing-lighter/

Debra, in “breathelighter”, mentions eclectic interests.
She also says: “
Keeping an active mind and following my curiosity is what also reduces stress and assures that I’m breathing lighter! I hope you’ll feel welcome to come along at any time. I enjoy sharing.”

She also talks about creativity in answer to one comment. She replies to one comment as follows:

“You made a very interesting point with the question, “why do some people embrace it [creativity] more easily than others?” Really good question…and I don’t know! LOL! If I depended on defining creativity as personal artistic expression, I’d come up lacking! 🙂 But I’m creative in following the trail of little day-trips, museums, libraries and gardens, checking into areas of interest, and I think that nourishes my soul, which may answer best about creativity! I like people with eclectic interests, so I think you and I would do very well spending time together!”

Yesterday Debra said in her comment to my last post the following: “I share in your desire for more peace between nations and individuals in 2015. . . . “

Some Comments I made regarding the Russel Brand ‘Revolution’

auntyuta Says:

October 27, 2013 at 5:36 amChristopher Goodfellow
theguardian.com, Saturday 26 October 2013 02.02 AEST
. . . . But the left is ripe for a unique, intelligent leader who can truly work with the protest movement. Often the underdog is simply the politician that breaks from the normal rhetoric and speaks in manner which sounds different to the existing political elite.

Brand hasn’t put in the work, but the stage is set, so to speak. Paxman rather likes Brand too, and that’s probably something that would help should he take up my call and lead the revolution. And, if you look closely, he’s already made the implicit nod he’ll take up the mantle: “I don’t need the right [to be involved in politics] from you, I don’t need the right from anybody, I’m taking it.”

“The existent political elite” is mentioned in the above comment. At present the voter has no alternative but to vote for the existent political elite of one of the two major parties who differ only slightly in what they want to achieve politically. For if you vote for one of the minor parties your vote does not really count. As far as I can see it is about the same in all the Western Democracies. For people who absolutely do want a change in policies there should be the opportunity to vote for a true alternative. I think many people who are as frustrated with the political system as Brand is, would welcome the chance to be able to vote for a change.

  • October 27, 2013 at 6:27 amThere is no alternative. I, like you wanted to believe our hard fought for votes meant something.
    This present political system is flawed and broken.
    Russell is saying he does not want to be a part of the old paradigm. He advocates for a total change – not politicians but “admin bods” which is really what politicians are or should be. Which is a type of public servant. The public is us – the tax payer – the majority. They should be looking after and serving us and not their corporate overlords and sponsors. It is reaching critical mass now, a tipping point .

    • auntyuta Says:

      October 27, 2013 at 6:59 amCome to think of it we should really all be some kind of public servants, namely do whatever is good for the general public. Not everyone has the same qualifications or abilities. We all need to keep learning right into old age and pass on the knowledge we have acquired. There are very well qualified and highly trained people in our society. We should value them for the work they do for the whole community.
      We should respect each other, not waste our energies abusing each other!
      I agree, our present political system seems to be rather flawed. “The existing political elite” may not want any changes. Someone belonging to this elite should point out to them that changes are necessary and genuinely welcome some new ideas by people who do not belong to the established ‘elite’.
      Personally I prefer a well functioning society to one where ‘chaos’ prevails. We need capable, well trained people for a well functioning society. But we also need new ideas for instance how corruption can be prevented. We definitely ought to introduce measures to slow down climate change as much as possible.